Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 3220T

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i3 3220T

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220T

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220T

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 147,100 MB/s vs 33.3 MB/s Around 4417.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better performance per dollar 1.1 pt/$ vs 0.56 pt/$ Around 2x better performance per dollar
Better PassMark score 3,697 vs 839 Around 4.5x better PassMark score
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Sep, 2011 Release date 11 months later
Better performance per watt 3.93 pt/W vs 2.89 pt/W More than 35% better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.87 GHz vs 2.13 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom D2700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D2700

Report a correction
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 65 °C Around 55% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 28.44W 3.5x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 3.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 3.5x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220T vs Atom D2700

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220T
147,100 MB/s
Atom D2700
33.3 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3220T  vs
Atom D2700 
Clock speed 2.8 GHz 2.13 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 35W 10W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 3.93 pt/W 2.89 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 8.13W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 2,500 MT/s

details

Core i3 3220T  vs
Atom D2700 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 65°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.87 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.87 GHz 2.13 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2500 Integrated
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 640 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 8,533.33 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 4,096 MB
Intel Core i3 3220T
Report a correction
Intel Atom D2700
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus