CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3220 vs U1400 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i3 3220 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3220  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 3220

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 2.8x higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 5,351 vs 941 Around 5.8x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 5,399 vs 508 Around 10.8x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764 vs 380 Around 4.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz vs 1.57 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Apr, 2006 Release date over 6 years later
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 3x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of Intel Core Solo U1400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core Solo U1400

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Much lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 44.69W 9.2x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 13.25 $/year 9.2x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 48.18 $/year 9.2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better performance per watt 3.54 pt/W vs 2.69 pt/W More than 30% better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs Solo U1400

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220
173,000 MB/s
Core Solo U1400
47.9 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3220  vs
Solo U1400 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1155
479

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 55W 6W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 1.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 5.26 $/year
Performance per watt 2.69 pt/W 3.54 pt/W
Typical power consumption 44.69W 4.88W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i3 3220  vs
Solo U1400 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 33 9

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 1.57 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz 1.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 1.57 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2500 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction
Intel Core Solo U1400
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus