Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1.73 GHz More than 90% higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz vs 1.73 GHz Around 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz vs 1.73 GHz Around 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core Solo T1250

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core Solo T1250

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 25.19W vs 44.69W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 7.47 $/year vs 13.25 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 27.16 $/year vs 48.18 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Core i3 3220  vs Solo T1250 

clock speed

Core i3 3220
3.3 GHz
Core Solo T1250
1.73 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Core i3 3220
3.43 GHz
Core Solo T1250
1.73 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Core i3 3220
3.46 GHz
Core Solo T1250
1.73 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3220  vs
Solo T1250 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 1.73 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1155
M

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 55W 31W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 7.47 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 27.16 $/year
Typical power consumption 44.69W 25.19W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i3 3220  vs
Solo T1250 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 33 13

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 1.73 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz 1.73 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 1.73 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2500 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction
Intel Core Solo T1250
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus