Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 3220

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1.86 GHz More than 75% higher clock speed
Much better turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 667 MHz More than 55% better turbo clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764 vs 762 More than 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 85% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 500 MHz 30% higher GPU clock speed
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better PassMark score 4,229 vs 994 More than 4.2x better PassMark score
Significantly better performance per dollar 1.18 pt/$ vs 0.89 pt/$ Around 35% better performance per dollar
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Jan, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz vs 1.87 GHz More than 85% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Better performance per watt 2.69 pt/W vs 1.8 pt/W Around 50% better performance per watt
Front view of Intel Celeron P4505

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron P4505

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 44.69W More than 35% lower typical power consumption
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 13.25 $/year More than 35% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 48.18 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs Celeron P4505

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3220  vs
Celeron P4505 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 1.86 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1155
BGA 1288

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 55W 35W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 2.69 pt/W 1.8 pt/W
Typical power consumption 44.69W 28.44W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 2,500 MT/s

details

Core i3 3220  vs
Celeron P4505 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 33 14

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 1.87 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2500 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 500 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz 667 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 17,066.66 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 8,192 MB
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction
Intel Celeron P4505
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus