Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 3220

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220
Front view of Intel Celeron M 340

Intel Celeron M 340

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Jun, 2004 Release date over 8 years later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz vs 1.94 GHz More than 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron M 340

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 340

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 19.91W vs 44.69W 2.2x lower typical power consumption
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 5.9 $/year vs 13.25 $/year 2.2x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 21.46 $/year vs 48.18 $/year 2.2x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Core i3 3220  vs Celeron M 340 

clock speed

Core i3 3220
3.3 GHz
Celeron M 340
1.5 GHz

L2 cache

Core i3 3220
0.5 MB
Celeron M 340
0.5 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Core i3 3220
3.43 GHz
Celeron M 340
1.94 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Core i3 3220
3.46 GHz
Celeron M 340
1.5 GHz

TDP

Core i3 3220
55W
Celeron M 340
24.5W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Core i3 3220  vs
Celeron M 340 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1155
478
479

features
Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption
TDP 55W 24.5W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 5.9 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 21.46 $/year
Typical power consumption 44.69W 19.91W

bus
Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

 Core i3 3220  vs
Celeron M 340 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 33 15

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 1.94 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 1.94 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2500 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz N/A

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 340
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss