0 Comments
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs Celeron M 340 |
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3220
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz |
![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
VS
Released June, 2004
Intel Celeron M 340
- 1.5 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Celeron M 340
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 19.91W | ![]() | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 5.9 $/year | ![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 21.46 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Around 2.2x higher clock speed | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Newer | Sep, 2012 | vs | Jun, 2004 | Release date over 8 years later | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | vs | 1.94 GHz | More than 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more threads | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 19.91W | vs | 44.69W | 2.2x lower typical power consumption | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 5.9 $/year | vs | 13.25 $/year | 2.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 21.46 $/year | vs | 48.18 $/year | 2.2x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Core i3 3220 vs Celeron M 340
clock speed
Core i3 3220
3.3 GHz
Celeron M 340
1.5 GHz
L2 cache
Core i3 3220
0.5 MB
Celeron M 340
0.5 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Core i3 3220
3.43 GHz
Celeron M 340
1.94 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Core i3 3220
3.46 GHz
Celeron M 340
1.5 GHz
TDP
Core i3 3220
55W
Celeron M 340
24.5W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3220 | vs | Celeron M 340 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
478 | |||
479 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 55W | 24.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 5.9 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 21.46 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 19.91W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Core i3 3220 | vs | Celeron M 340 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
Threads | 4 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 130 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 33 | 15 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.43 GHz | 1.94 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | 1.94 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Supports ECC | No | No |
Intel Core i3 3220 ![]() | Intel Celeron M 340 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD A4 5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD A6 5400K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Core2 Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $75 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Pentium G2020 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $76 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Pentium G2030 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $94 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Pentium J2900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $179 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||