Intel Core i3 3220 vs Celeron J1900 |
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3220
 | Significantly higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | | Much better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score 5,814 |
| | Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz | | Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 2,501 |
by Don-Woligroski (Oct, 2012)The Core i3-3220 doesn't benefit from Intel's Turbo Boost technology at all, but instead relies on an architecture able to execute more instructions per cycle than AMD.
VS
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1900
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Celeron J1900
| | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | | Lower typical power consumption 8.13W |
| | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core | | More cores 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 65% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score | 5,814 | vs | 1,801 | Around 3.2x better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score | |||
| Significantly better turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | vs | 854 MHz | Around 25% better turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score | 2,501 | vs | 924 | Around 2.8x better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
| Significantly better performance per dollar | 1.32 pt/$ | vs | 0.53 pt/$ | More than 2.5x better performance per dollar | |||
| Better PassMark score | 4,229 | vs | 1,863 | More than 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.44 GHz | vs | 2.42 GHz | More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better cinebench r10 32Bit score | 12,548 | vs | 6,342 | Around 2x better cinebench r10 32Bit score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.48 GHz | vs | 2.42 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 44.69W | 5.5x lower typical power consumption | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 650 MHz | More than 5% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2013 | vs | Sep, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Better performance per watt | 4.31 pt/W | vs | 2.81 pt/W | Around 55% better performance per watt | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 48.18 $/year | 5.5x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 13.25 $/year | 5.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs Celeron J1900
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
Cinebench R10 32-Bit
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3220 | vs | Celeron J1900 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 688 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | 854 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 8,192 MB | |
details | Core i3 3220 | vs | Celeron J1900 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.44 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.48 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.44 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 55W | 10W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.81 pt/W | 4.31 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Core i3 3220  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron J1900 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $89 | $117 | |
| Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $50 | $117 | |
| Intel Pentium G2020 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $20 | $117 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $500 | $117 | |
| AMD A4 6300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $150 | $117 | |
| Intel Pentium G2030 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $50 | $117 | |
| AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $69 | $117 | |
| AMD A6 5400K vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $675 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $296 | ||
| AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $1,123 | $281 | |
| AMD A8 7410 vs Intel Core i5 5200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $675 | ||
| AMD A10 7th Gen A10-9600P vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $168 | $300 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,452 | $675 | |
| Intel 7200U vs Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | ||
| Intel N3710 vs Core i3 5005U | ||
