Winner
Intel Core i3 3220
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3220 based on its performance, single-core performance and value.
See full details | Intel Core i3 3220 vs Celeron J1900 |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | ![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764 |
![]() | Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 1.18 pt/$ |
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W |
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
7.7 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
Intel Core i3 3220CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 65% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,764 | vs | 534 | More than 3.2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Significantly better turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | vs | 854 MHz | Around 25% better turbo clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 1.18 pt/$ | vs | 0.52 pt/$ | More than 2.2x better performance per dollar | |||
Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score | 4.07 mHash/s | vs | 1.78 mHash/s | More than 2.2x better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score | |||
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 5,399 | vs | 2,927 | Around 85% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | vs | 2.42 GHz | More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | vs | 2.42 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 44.69W | 5.5x lower typical power consumption | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Better performance per watt | 4.27 pt/W | vs | 2.69 pt/W | Around 60% better performance per watt | |||
Slightly higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 650 MHz | More than 5% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 13.25 $/year | 5.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 48.18 $/year | 5.5x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Newer | Oct, 2013 | vs | Sep, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later |
summary | Core i3 3220 | vs | Celeron J1900 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 688 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | 854 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 8,192 MB |
details | Core i3 3220 | vs | Celeron J1900 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.43 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 55W | 10W | |
Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.69 pt/W | 4.27 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Core i3 3220 ![]() | Intel Celeron J1900 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $125 | |
Intel Pentium G2020 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
AMD A6 5400K vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$76 | $125 | |
Intel Pentium G2030 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $125 | |
Intel Core i5 2400 vs i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$145 | $125 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||