CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3220 vs J1900 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
Core i3 3220
3.6
Celeron J1900
5.1
Core2 Duo E8400
5.2
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
Core i3 3220
6.9
Celeron J1900
5.3
Core2 Duo E8400
6.2
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Core i3 3220
1.5
Celeron J1900
n.d.
Core2 Duo E8400
0.0
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Core i3 3220
4.9
Celeron J1900
5.1
Core2 Duo E8400
0.0
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Core i3 3220
5.2
Celeron J1900
6.7
Core2 Duo E8400
5.0
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
Core i3 3220
6.2
Celeron J1900
n.d.
Core2 Duo E8400
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more
7.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets
Core i3 3220
6.4
Celeron J1900
7.7
Core2 Duo E8400
5.1

Winner
Intel Core i3 3220 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3220  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 3220

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Intel Celeron J1900

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 65% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764 vs 534 More than 3.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 854 MHz Around 25% better turbo clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 1.18 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ More than 2.2x better performance per dollar
Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score 4.07 mHash/s vs 1.78 mHash/s More than 2.2x better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 5,399 vs 2,927 Around 85% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz vs 2.42 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz vs 2.42 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 44.69W 5.5x lower typical power consumption
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better performance per watt 4.27 pt/W vs 2.69 pt/W Around 60% better performance per watt
Slightly higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 650 MHz More than 5% higher GPU clock speed
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 13.25 $/year 5.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 48.18 $/year 5.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Sep, 2012 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs Celeron J1900

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i3 3220
4.07 mHash/s
Celeron J1900
1.78 mHash/s

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220
5,399
Celeron J1900
2,927

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220
2,501
Celeron J1900
924

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220
173,000 MB/s
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220
5,351
Celeron J1900
2,887

GeekBench

Core i3 3220
8,919
Celeron J1900
2,887

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i3 3220
4,229
Celeron J1900
1,863

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i3 3220
1,764
Celeron J1900
534

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Core i3 3220  vs
Celeron J1900 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2500 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz 854 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 8,192 MB

details

 Core i3 3220  vs
Celeron J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption
TDP 55W 10W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 2.69 pt/W 4.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 44.69W 8.13W

bus
Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss