0 Comments
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs Celeron J1900 |
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3220
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | ![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764 |
![]() | Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 1.18 pt/$ |
VS
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1900
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Celeron J1900
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W |
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 65% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,764 | vs | 534 | More than 3.2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Significantly better turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | vs | 854 MHz | Around 25% better turbo clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 1.18 pt/$ | vs | 0.52 pt/$ | More than 2.2x better performance per dollar | |||
Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score | 4.07 mHash/s | vs | 1.78 mHash/s | More than 2.2x better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score | |||
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 5,399 | vs | 2,927 | Around 85% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | vs | 2.42 GHz | More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | vs | 2.42 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 44.69W | 5.5x lower typical power consumption | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Better performance per watt | 4.27 pt/W | vs | 2.69 pt/W | Around 60% better performance per watt | |||
Slightly higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 650 MHz | More than 5% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 13.25 $/year | 5.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 48.18 $/year | 5.5x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Newer | Oct, 2013 | vs | Sep, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs Celeron J1900
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
Core i3 3220
4.07 mHash/s
Celeron J1900
1.78 mHash/s
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 3220
5,399
Celeron J1900
2,927
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 3220
2,501
Celeron J1900
924
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 3220
173,000 MB/s
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 3220
5,351
Celeron J1900
2,887
GeekBench
Core i3 3220
8,919
Celeron J1900
2,887
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i3 3220
4,229
Celeron J1900
1,863
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i3 3220
1,764
Celeron J1900
534
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3220 | vs | Celeron J1900 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 688 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | 854 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 8,192 MB |
details | Core i3 3220 | vs | Celeron J1900 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.43 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 55W | 10W | |
Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.69 pt/W | 4.27 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Core i3 3220 ![]() | Intel Celeron J1900 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $125 | |
Intel Pentium G2020 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$94 | $125 | |
Intel Pentium J2900 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $125 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
AMD E1 2500 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$76 | $125 | |
Intel Pentium G2030 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||