CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3220 vs J1800 among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i3 3220 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3220  based on its performance, single-core performance and overclocking.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 2.41 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Much better PassMark score 4,229 vs 1,028 More than 4x better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764 vs 554 Around 3.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz vs 2.58 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Supports more RAM 32,768 MB vs 8,192 MB Supports 4x more RAM
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz vs 2.58 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 44.69W 5.5x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 48.18 $/year 5.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 13.25 $/year 5.5x lower annual home energy cost
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Sep, 2012 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs Celeron J1800

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220
173,000 MB/s
Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3220  vs
Celeron J1800 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 2.41 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2500 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz 792 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 8,192 MB

details

Core i3 3220  vs
Celeron J1800 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 2.58 GHz

power consumption

TDP 55W 10W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 2.69 pt/W 3.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption 44.69W 8.13W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
can we estimate the difference of IPC through the power consumption ?
comments powered by Disqus