Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 85% higher GPU clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 15% better turbo clock speed
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Slightly more l3 cache 3 MB vs 1 MB 3x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron 927UE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 927UE

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 44.69W 3.2x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 65.3 °C More than 60% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 13.25 $/year 3.2x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 48.18 $/year 3.2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Sep, 2012 Release date 4 months later

Features Key features of the Core i3 3220  vs Celeron 927UE 

clock speed

Core i3 3220
3.3 GHz
Celeron 927UE
1.5 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

gpu clock speed

Core i3 3220
650 MHz
Celeron 927UE
350 MHz

overclocked clock speed (air)

Core i3 3220
3.43 GHz
Celeron 927UE
1.5 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Core i3 3220
3.46 GHz
Celeron 927UE
1.5 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3220  vs
Celeron 927UE 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1155
BGA 1023

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 55W 17W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 14.89 $/year
Typical power consumption 44.69W 13.81W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i3 3220  vs
Celeron 927UE 
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 65.3°C Unknown - 105°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 1.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2500 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz 900 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 16,384 MB
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 927UE
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus