Winner
Intel Core i3 3220
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3220 based on its performance.
See full details | Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD Turion X2 Ultra 80 |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.3 GHz |
![]() | Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 5,351 | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,503 | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | ![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
8.3 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.1 GHz | More than 55% higher clock speed | |||
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 5,351 | vs | 1,543 | Around 3.5x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much better geekbench 3 single core score | 2,501 | vs | 845 | Around 3x better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 5,399 | vs | 1,640 | More than 3.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | vs | 2.26 GHz | More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Newer | Sep, 2012 | vs | Jun, 2008 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | vs | 2.1 GHz | Around 65% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Better performance per watt | 2.69 pt/W | vs | 1.96 pt/W | More than 35% better performance per watt | |||
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 1,503 | vs | 47.7 | More than 31.5x better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 65.3 °C | Around 55% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 26W | vs | 44.69W | More than 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 7.71 $/year | vs | 13.25 $/year | More than 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 28.03 $/year | vs | 48.18 $/year | More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost |
summary | Core i3 3220 | vs | Turion X2 Ultra 80 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
S1 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 55W | 32W | |
Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 7.71 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 28.03 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.69 pt/W | 1.96 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 26W |
details | Core i3 3220 | vs | Turion X2 Ultra 80 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 65.3°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.43 GHz | 2.26 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 3,775.1 | 571.8 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | 2.26 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | N/A |
Intel Core i3 3220 ![]() | AMD Turion X2 Ultra 80 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
3220 vs 5400K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
3220 vs 5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
3220 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $75 | |
3220 vs G2020 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $179 | |
3220 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $94 | |
3220 vs J2900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $76 | |
3220 vs G2030 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||