0 Comments
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD Sempron 3000+ |
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3220
![]() | Much more l3 cache 3 MB | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Sempron 3000+
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 3000+
![]() | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 3 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 3 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 85% higher clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more threads | |||
Much better PassMark score | 4,229 | vs | 407 | Around 10.5x better PassMark score | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,764 | vs | 513 | Around 3.5x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much better performance per watt | 2.69 pt/W | vs | 0.6 pt/W | Around 4.5x better performance per watt | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 0 MB/core | Compared to all cpus, 1.5 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 50.38W | More than 10% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 14.94 $/year | More than 10% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 54.31 $/year | More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 70 °C | vs | 65.3 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs Sempron 3000+
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i3 3220
4,229
Sempron 3000+
407
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i3 3220
1,764
Sempron 3000+
513
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3220 | vs | Sempron 3000+ |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
754 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Core i3 3220 | vs | Sempron 3000+ |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.13 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.13 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 0 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 65.3°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 55W | 62W | |
Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 14.94 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 54.31 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.69 pt/W | 0.6 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 50.38W |
Intel Core i3 3220 ![]() | AMD Sempron 3000+ ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
3220 vs 5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
3220 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $75 | |
3220 vs G2020 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $94 | |
3220 vs J2900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $82 | |
3220 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
3220 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $179 | |
3220 vs E8400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||