Winner
Intel Core i3 3220
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3220 based on its overclocking.
See full details Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD Sempron 2800+ |
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
3.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3220
 | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | More threads 4 |
by Don-Woligroski (Oct, 2012)But because the Ivy Bridge design enjoys far superior IPC than AMD's best effort, each core is made all the more effective, despite a substantial frequency deficit.
VS
Released July, 2004
AMD Sempron 2800+
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
0 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 2800+
| | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3220 vs 2800+ among desktop CPUs (45 to 75W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 3.2 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 2x higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more threads | |||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | vs | 2.36 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 70 °C | vs | 65.3 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs Sempron 2800+
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3220 | vs | Sempron 2800+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
| 754 | |||
| AM2 | |||
| 462 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 55W | 62W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 14.94 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 54.31 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.69 pt/W | 0.44 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 50.38W | |
details | Core i3 3220 | vs | Sempron 2800+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
| Threads | 4 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 0 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 90 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 65.3°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 50 | 1 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.43 GHz | 2.36 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 3,775.1 | 543.6 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | 2.36 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | N/A | |
 Intel Core i3 3220  Report a correction |  AMD Sempron 2800+ Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| 5300 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $50 | $125 | |
| 5400K vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | ||
| Q6600 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $125 | |
| G2020 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $76 | $125 | |
| G2030 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $82 | $125 | |
| J1900 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $144 | $125 | |
| E8400 vs 3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
