Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD Phenom X4 9650 |
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3220
 | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764 |
VS
Released March, 2008
AMD Phenom X4 9650
- 2.3 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD Phenom X4 9650
| | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | | More cores 4 |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core | | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | Around 45% higher clock speed | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,764 | vs | 787 | Around 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 77.19W | More than 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | vs | 2.81 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Newer | Sep, 2012 | vs | Mar, 2008 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | vs | 3.12 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 70 °C | vs | 65.3 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs Phenom X4 9650
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3220 | vs | Phenom X4 9650 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
| AM2+ | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 55W | 95W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.69 pt/W | 1.15 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 77.19W | |
details | Core i3 3220 | vs | Phenom X4 9650 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 65 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 65.3°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 50 | 5 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.43 GHz | 2.81 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | 3.12 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 3,775.1 | 672.3 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | 2.81 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | N/A | |
 Intel Core i3 3220  Report a correction |  AMD Phenom X4 9650 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| 5300 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | ||
| Q6600 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $125 | |
| G2020 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $94 | $125 | |
| J2900 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $82 | $125 | |
| J1900 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | $125 | |
| E8400 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | ||
| 2500 vs 3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
