0 Comments
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD Phenom II X4 905e |
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3220
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 44.69W |
VS
Released June, 2009
AMD Phenom II X4 905e
- 2.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD Phenom II X4 905e
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | More cores 4 |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core | ![]() | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 52.81W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Sep, 2012 | vs | Jun, 2009 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 70 °C | vs | 65.3 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs Phenom II X4 905e
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 3220
5,399
Phenom II X4 905e
3,038
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 3220
2,501
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 3220
173,000 MB/s
Phenom II X4 905e
66.3 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 3220
5,351
Phenom II X4 905e
4,514
GeekBench
Core i3 3220
8,919
Phenom II X4 905e
4,811
Cinebench R11.5
Core i3 3220
2.73
Phenom II X4 905e
2.99
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i3 3220
4,229
Phenom II X4 905e
3,080
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i3 3220
1,764
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3220 | vs | Phenom II X4 905e |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
AM3 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 55W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.69 pt/W | 1.17 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 52.81W |
details | Core i3 3220 | vs | Phenom II X4 905e |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 6 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 65.3°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.43 GHz | 3.41 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | 3.41 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | N/A |
Intel Core i3 3220 ![]() | AMD Phenom II X4 905e ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
AMD A6 5400K vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $125 | |
Intel Pentium G2020 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$94 | $125 | |
Intel Pentium J2900 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $125 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $125 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||