Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD Opteron X2100 Series X2150 |
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3220
 | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | | Has virtualization support Yes |
| | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | More l3 cache 3 MB |
VS
First seen on January, 2016
AMD Opteron X2100 Series X2150
- 1.9 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron X2100 Series X2150
| | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 17.88W |
| | More cores 4 | | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | Around 75% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 28 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More l3 cache | 3 MB | vs | None | Compared to all cpus, 3 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
| Higher GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | vs | 600 MHz | Around 10% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 17.88W | vs | 44.69W | 2.5x lower typical power consumption | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 5.3 $/year | vs | 13.25 $/year | 2.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 19.27 $/year | vs | 48.18 $/year | 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Core i3 3220 vs Opteron X2100 Series X2150
clock speed
L2 cache
gpu clock speed
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3220 | vs | Opteron X2100 Series X2150 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 55W | 22W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 5.3 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 19.27 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 17.88W | |
details | Core i3 3220 | vs | Opteron X2100 Series X2150 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | None | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 28 nm | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | Radeon™ HD 8400 | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 600 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
 Intel Core i3 3220  Report a correction |  AMD Opteron X2100 Series X2150 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5400K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| 3220 vs Q6600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $75 | |
| 3220 vs G2020 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $76 | |
| 3220 vs G2030 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $179 | |
| 3220 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $94 | |
| 3220 vs J2900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
