0 Comments
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD Opteron X2100 Series X2150 |
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3220
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
![]() | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | More l3 cache 3 MB |
VS
First seen on January, 2016
AMD Opteron X2100 Series X2150
- 1.9 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron X2100 Series X2150
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 17.88W |
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | Around 75% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 28 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More l3 cache | 3 MB | vs | None | Compared to all cpus, 3 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
Higher GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | vs | 600 MHz | Around 10% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 17.88W | vs | 44.69W | 2.5x lower typical power consumption | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 5.3 $/year | vs | 13.25 $/year | 2.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 19.27 $/year | vs | 48.18 $/year | 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Core i3 3220 vs Opteron X2100 Series X2150
clock speed
Core i3 3220
3.3 GHz
Opteron X2100 Series X2150
1.9 GHz
L2 cache
Core i3 3220
0.5 MB
gpu clock speed
Core i3 3220
650 MHz
Opteron X2100 Series X2150
600 MHz
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3220 | vs | Opteron X2100 Series X2150 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 55W | 22W | |
Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 5.3 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 19.27 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 17.88W |
details | Core i3 3220 | vs | Opteron X2100 Series X2150 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | None | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 28 nm | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | Radeon™ HD 8400 | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 600 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3 |
Intel Core i3 3220 ![]() | AMD Opteron X2100 Series X2150 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
3220 vs 5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
3220 vs 5400K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
3220 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $75 | |
3220 vs G2020 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $76 | |
3220 vs G2030 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $179 | |
3220 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $94 | |
3220 vs J2900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||