Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 3220

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220
Front view of AMD Opteron 8212

AMD Opteron 8212

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 65% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 44.69W vs 77.19W More than 40% lower typical power consumption
Significantly more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 3x more l3 cache per core
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Aug, 2006 Release date over 6 years later
Slightly more l3 cache 3 MB vs 1 MB 3x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz vs 2.66 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher Maximum operating temperature 65.3 °C vs 55 °C Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Much lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 40% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 8212

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 8212

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Core i3 3220  vs Opteron 8212 

clock speed

Core i3 3220
3.3 GHz
Opteron 8212
2 GHz

L2 cache

Core i3 3220
0.5 MB
Opteron 8212
2 MB

L3 cache

Core i3 3220
3 MB
Opteron 8212
1 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Core i3 3220
3.43 GHz
Opteron 8212
2.66 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Core i3 3220
3.46 GHz
Opteron 8212
2 GHz

TDP

Core i3 3220
55W
Opteron 8212
95W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Core i3 3220  vs
Opteron 8212 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1155
F
Is unlocked No No

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 55W 95W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 83.22 $/year
Typical power consumption 44.69W 77.19W

details

 Core i3 3220  vs
Opteron 8212 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 8
Clock multiplier 33 10
Operating temperature Unknown - 65.3°C 0 - 55°C

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 2.66 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 2.66 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2500 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz N/A
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 8212
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss