Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 2x higher clock speed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 44.69W vs 68.82W More than 35% lower typical power consumption
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Jun, 2003 Release date over 9 years later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark score 4,229 vs 428 Around 10x better PassMark score
Better performance per watt 2.69 pt/W vs 0.21 pt/W More than 13x better performance per watt
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year vs 20.4 $/year More than 35% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year vs 74.2 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 142

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 142

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs Opteron 142

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3220  vs
Opteron 142 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1155
940

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Core i3 3220  vs
Opteron 142 
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 33 8

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 1.6 GHz

power consumption

TDP 55W 84.7W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 20.4 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 74.2 $/year
Performance per watt 2.69 pt/W 0.21 pt/W
Typical power consumption 44.69W 68.82W
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 142
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus