Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD FX 4200 |
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3220
 | Much lower typical power consumption 44.69W | | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
| | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year | | Much lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year |
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD FX 4200
- 3.3 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the AMD FX 4200
| | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Is unlocked Yes |
| | More cores 4 | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 101.56W | 2.3x lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 109.5 $/year | 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 30.11 $/year | 2.3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.37 GHz | vs | 3.43 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 5.08 GHz | vs | 3.46 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs FX 4200
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3220 | vs | FX 4200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
| AM3+ | |||
| Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | HyperTransport 3.1 | |
details | Core i3 3220 | vs | FX 4200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.43 GHz | 4.37 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | 5.08 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | 4.37 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 55W | 125W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 30.11 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 109.5 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.69 pt/W | 7.19 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 101.56W | |
 Intel Core i3 3220  Report a correction |  AMD FX 4200 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| 5300 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | ||
| Q6600 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $125 | |
| G2020 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $94 | $125 | |
| J2900 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | $125 | |
| E8400 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | ||
| 2500 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $82 | $125 | |
| J1900 vs 3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
