Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Much more l3 cache 3 MB vs 0.5 MB 6x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better PassMark score 4,229 vs 1,436 Around 3x better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764 vs 800 Around 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 5,351 vs 2,093 More than 2.5x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much better performance per watt 2.69 pt/W vs 1.14 pt/W More than 2.2x better performance per watt
Much more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 6x more l3 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 44.69W vs 52.81W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz vs 3.28 GHz Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 15% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E2 3200

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 3200

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 71.5 °C vs 65.3 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Nov, 2019 vs Sep, 2012 Release date over 7 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs E2 3200

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220
5,351
E2 3200
2,093

GeekBench

Core i3 3220
8,919
E2 3200
2,093

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i3 3220
4,229
E2 3200
1,436

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i3 3220
1,764
E2 3200
800

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3220  vs
E2 3200 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 55W 65W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 2.69 pt/W 1.14 pt/W
Typical power consumption 44.69W 52.81W

details

Core i3 3220  vs
E2 3200 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 65.3°C Unknown - 71.5°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 3.28 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 3.28 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2500 AMD Radeon HD 6370D

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction
AMD E2 3200
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus