Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD E1 2500

older Released September, 2012

Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3220

	Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz		Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm
	Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz		Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764

older Released April, 2013

Reasons to buy the AMD E1 2500

	More l2 cache 1 MB		Much higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C
	Significantly better performance per watt 12.97 pt/W		Lower typical power consumption 12.19W

I am not even sure why I was asked to compare the Intel Core i3 3220 and the AMD E1 2500. At first glance I knew which processor I would like more, and the tests only confirmed that.

While the AMD processor operates with much less power than the Intel one- which brings its annual energy cost down significantly- and has a higher threshold on its operating temperature, the i3 just blows the E1 out of the water in every other aspect. It not only more than twice the clock speed of the E1, but it is also hyperthreaded, comes with more features and also boasts a newer manufacturing process.

The sheet below support my verdict rather firmly, making the Intel Core i3 3220 the much better processor choice than the AMD E1 2500.

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction

Much higher clock speed

3.3 GHz

1.4 GHz

More than 2.2x higher clock speed

Significantly newer manufacturing process

22 nm

28 nm

A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor

Much higher GPU clock speed

650 MHz

400 MHz

Around 65% higher GPU clock speed

Much better PassMark (Single core) score

1,764

517

Around 3.5x better PassMark (Single core) score

Significantly better 3DMark06 CPU score

47.7

16.5

Around 3x better 3DMark06 CPU score

Better PassMark score

4,229

882

More than 4.8x better PassMark score

Better overclocked clock speed (Air)

3.44 GHz

1.4 GHz

Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Better overclocked clock speed (Water)

3.48 GHz

1.4 GHz

Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 2500

Report a correction

More l2 cache

1 MB

0.5 MB

2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later

Much higher Maximum operating temperature

90 °C

65.3 °C

Around 40% higher Maximum operating temperature

Significantly better performance per watt

12.97 pt/W

2.84 pt/W

More than 4.5x better performance per watt

Lower typical power consumption

12.19W

44.69W

3.7x lower typical power consumption

Significantly more l2 cache per core

0.5 MB/core

0.25 MB/core

2x more l2 cache per core

Newer

Apr, 2013

Sep, 2012

Release date 8 months later

Lower annual commercial energy cost

13.14 $/year

48.18 $/year

3.7x lower annual commercial energy cost

Lower annual home energy cost

3.61 $/year

13.25 $/year

3.7x lower annual home energy cost

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220

5,399

E1 2500

1,221

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220

2,501

E1 2500

730

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220

173,000 MB/s

E1 2500

677,550 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220

5,351

E1 2500

1,162

GeekBench

Core i3 3220

8,919

E1 2500

1,162

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Core i3 3220

47.7

E1 2500

16.5

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i3 3220

4,229

E1 2500

882

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i3 3220

1,764

E1 2500

517

summary	Core i3 3220	E1 2500
Clock speed	3.3 GHz	1.4 GHz
Cores	Dual core	Dual core
Is unlocked	No	No
features
Has a NX bit	Yes	Yes
Has virtualization support	Yes	Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes	Yes
power consumption
TDP	55W	15W
Annual home energy cost	13.25 $/year	3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost	48.18 $/year	13.14 $/year
Performance per watt	2.84 pt/W	12.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption	44.69W	12.19W

details	Core i3 3220	E1 2500
Architecture	x86-64	x86-64
Threads	4	2
L2 cache	0.5 MB	1 MB
L2 cache per core	0.25 MB/core	0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process	22 nm	28 nm
Max CPUs	1	1
Operating temperature	Unknown - 65.3°C	Unknown - 90°C
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed	3.44 GHz	1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	3.48 GHz	1.4 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked)	3,775.1	717.1
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	3.44 GHz	1.4 GHz
integrated graphics
GPU	GPU	GPU
Label	Intel® HD Graphics 2500	Radeon™ HD 8240
GPU clock speed	650 MHz	400 MHz
memory controller
Memory controller	Built-in	Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
DDR3L-1333

Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction

AMD E1 2500

Report a correction

Systems

Looking for a system?

5 desktops with the Intel Core i3 3220, starting from $450
2 laptops with the AMD E1 2500, starting from $398

Compare

Popular Comparisons

Comments

Showing 1 comment.

notfookingtaken (02:21 PM, June 13, 2014)

you would have to be nuts to buy the AMD it is patheticly low powered benchmarks (passmark) is about 1/4 of the i3. You can get a lower powered i3-3320T which uses 35W not 55W, it's about 10% less powerful though. OK it still uses twice as much power, but it is 4 times as fast. I think the i3-3320T is great chip It does a hell of a lot on relatively low power indeed I am powered by an i3-3220T right now! I

	VS
$117		$89
3220 vs Q6600

	VS
$117		$20
3220 vs E8400

	VS
$117		$50
3220 vs G2020

	VS
$117		$500
3220 vs 6300

	VS
$117		$82
3220 vs J1900

	VS
$117		$150
3220 vs G2030

	VS
$117		$50
3220 vs 5300

	VS
$613
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410

	VS
$613
6200U vs 7th Gen A10-9600P

	VS
$300		$168
W3520 vs 2500

	VS
$344		$296
4790K vs 6700K

	VS
$281		$1,115
5200U vs 7410

	VS
$613
6200U vs 7200U

	VS
$296
6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P

Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD E1 2500