CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3220 vs 350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
Core i3 3220
3.6
E 350
3.3
Core2 Quad Q6600
5.3
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
Core i3 3220
6.9
E 350
5.1
Core2 Quad Q6600
5.8
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Core i3 3220
1.5
E 350
0.0
Core2 Quad Q6600
0.0
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Core i3 3220
4.9
E 350
5.7
Core2 Quad Q6600
0.0
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Core i3 3220
5.2
E 350
5.6
Core2 Quad Q6600
5.0
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
Core i3 3220
6.2
E 350
n.d.
Core2 Quad Q6600
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more
6.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets
Core i3 3220
6.4
E 350
6.2
Core2 Quad Q6600
5.1

Winner
Intel Core i3 3220 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3220  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 3220

CPUBoss Winner
 Front view of Intel Core i3 3220
Front view of AMD E 350

AMD E 350

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 47.7 vs 24 Around 2x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 2x higher clock speed
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 5,351 vs 1,032 Around 5.2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764 vs 420 Around 4.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 5,399 vs 1,096 Around 5x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 492 MHz More than 30% higher GPU clock speed
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better performance per watt 2.69 pt/W vs 1.5 pt/W Around 80% better performance per watt
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score 7.51 mHash/s vs 4.07 mHash/s Around 85% better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 65.3 °C Around 40% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower typical power consumption 30.2W vs 44.69W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower annual commercial energy cost 28.21 $/year vs 48.18 $/year More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 12 $/year vs 13.25 $/year Around 10% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs E 350

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Core i3 3220
4.07 mHash/s
E 350
7.51 mHash/s

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

Core i3 3220
2,251
E 350
1,106

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

Core i3 3220
932
E 350
590

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

Core i3 3220
2,654
E 350
1,175

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220
5,399
E 350
1,096

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220
2,501
E 350
620

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220
173,000 MB/s
E 350
51,600 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i3 3220
4,229
E 350
782

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Core i3 3220  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 55W 18W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 28.21 $/year
Performance per watt 2.69 pt/W 1.5 pt/W
Typical power consumption 44.69W 30.2W

details

 Core i3 3220  vs
E 350 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 33 8
Operating temperature Unknown - 65.3°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2500 Radeon™ HD 6310
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 492 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss