Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 3220

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 47.7 vs 20.3 More than 2.2x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1.3 GHz More than 2.5x higher clock speed
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 5,351 vs 827 Around 6.5x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764 vs 342 Around 5.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 5,399 vs 896 More than 6x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 488 MHz Around 35% higher GPU clock speed
Much more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 6x more l3 cache per core
More l3 cache 3 MB vs 0.5 MB 6x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Aug, 2011 Release date over a year later
Front view of AMD E 300

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 300

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 44.69W 3.1x lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 65.3 °C Around 40% higher Maximum operating temperature
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 13.25 $/year 3.1x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 48.18 $/year 3.1x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs E 300

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

Core i3 3220
2,251
E 300
956

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

Core i3 3220
2,654
E 300
1,068

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220
5,399
E 300
896

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220
2,501
E 300
512

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3220
173,000 MB/s
E 300
41,900 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Core i3 3220
4,229
E 300
614

PassMark (Single Core)

Core i3 3220
1,764
E 300
342

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3220  vs
E 300 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3

details

Core i3 3220  vs
E 300 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 33 5
Operating temperature Unknown - 65.3°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 2500 Radeon™ HD 6310
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 488 MHz

power consumption

TDP 55W 18W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 2.69 pt/W 2.34 pt/W
Typical power consumption 44.69W 14.63W
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction
AMD E 300
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
This Cpu is shit goes to 99% cpu utilazation and stalls on desktop ON IDLE!!!
comments powered by Disqus