Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD Athlon II 160u |
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3220
 | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | | More threads 4 |
| | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Much better PassMark score 4,229 |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Athlon II 160u
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon II 160u
| | Much more l2 cache 1 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
| | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 80 °C | | Much lower typical power consumption 16.25W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 85% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More threads | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more threads | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better PassMark score | 4,229 | vs | 556 | More than 7.5x better PassMark score | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,764 | vs | 557 | Around 3.2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | vs | 3.08 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 80 °C | vs | 65.3 °C | Around 25% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 16.25W | vs | 44.69W | 2.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 17.52 $/year | vs | 48.18 $/year | 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 4.82 $/year | vs | 13.25 $/year | 2.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs Athlon II 160u
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3220 | vs | Athlon II 160u |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Core i3 3220 | vs | Athlon II 160u |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 65.3°C | Unknown - 80°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.43 GHz | 3.08 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.46 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | 3.08 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 55W | 20W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 4.82 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 17.52 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.69 pt/W | 2.97 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 16.25W | |
 Intel Core i3 3220  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon II 160u Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| 3220 vs Q6600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $75 | |
| 3220 vs G2020 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5400K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $76 | |
| 3220 vs G2030 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $179 | |
| 3220 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $205 | |
| 3220 vs 2400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
