Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Much better PassMark score 4,229 vs 544 More than 7.8x better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764 vs 653 Around 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 5,351 vs 824 Around 6.5x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3400+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3400+

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs Athlon 64 3400+

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3220  vs
Athlon 64 3400+ 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1155
939

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES

details

Core i3 3220  vs
Athlon 64 3400+ 
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 44.69W N/A
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3400+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus