CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3220 vs 2000+ among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i3 3220 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3220  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 3.2x higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764 vs 479 Around 3.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better performance per dollar 1.32 pt/$ vs 0.83 pt/$ More than 60% better performance per dollar
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz vs 2.41 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark score 4,229 vs 299 Around 14.2x better PassMark score
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.48 GHz vs 1.67 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 2000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 2000+

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 6.5W vs 44.69W 6.9x lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 85 °C vs 65.3 °C More than 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better performance per watt 4.13 pt/W vs 2.81 pt/W More than 45% better performance per watt
Lower annual home energy cost 1.93 $/year vs 13.25 $/year 6.9x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 7.01 $/year vs 48.18 $/year 6.9x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs Athlon 64 2000+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3220  vs
Athlon 64 2000+ 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1155
462
AM2

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES

details

Core i3 3220  vs
Athlon 64 2000+ 
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 65.3°C Unknown - 85°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 2.41 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.48 GHz 1.67 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 3,775.1 486.6
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 2.41 GHz

power consumption

TDP 55W 8W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 1.93 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 7.01 $/year
Performance per watt 2.81 pt/W 4.13 pt/W
Typical power consumption 44.69W 6.5W
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 2000+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus