Intel Core i3 3220  vs AMD A6 5400K 

A gamer on a budget needs a CPU that’s fast and reliable, while still easy on the wallet. For this matchup, we’re comparing two desktop processors that fit the bill: the Intel Core i3 3220 versus the AMD A6 5400K. Which processor will heed the call of duty?

Their only similarity is that they’re both Dual Core; after that, their specifications vary greatly. Starting with the first CPU, the 3220 is a 3.3 GHz with 3MB cache. It packs an HD 2500 GPU, and consumes a modest 55W TDP. A great feature is that it’s hyperthreaded, which maximizes usage of each processor core.

In contrast is the 5400K: clocked faster at 3.6 GHz, but at the expense of a lower cache of only 0.5 MB. As an Advanced Processing Unit (APU), its focus is in a beefier GPU: it packs a Radeon HD 7540D which is much better than ordinary integrated graphics. It’s capable of playing casual games, or even as an HTPC. Moreover, its unlocked multiplier makes for easy overclockability: a great boon for enthusiasts. But as a result, it consumes more power at 65W TDP.

Looking at the benchmarks, the 3220 dominated: it scored 15% better at 3DMark11 physics, 16% better at Geekbench, and an outstanding 30% better at PassMark. In defense of the 5400K however, keep in mind that it’s less than half the price of the 3220. Additionally, you need to buy a discrete graphics card for the 3220 because its integrated graphics just won’t do for gaming even at low settings.

In conclusion, only consider the AMD A6 5400K if you're an extremely strapped gamer. But if you’re looking for a sound investment with future expandability, we recommend the Intel Core i3 3220.