Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD A6 3620 |
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
7.4 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3220
 | Significantly higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | | Is hyperthreaded Yes |
| | Newer manufacturing process 22 nms | | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764 |
by Don-Woligroski (Oct, 2012)The Core i3-3220 doesn't benefit from Intel's Turbo Boost technology at all, but instead relies on an architecture able to execute more instructions per cycle than AMD.
VS
Released January, 2012
AMD A6 3620
- 2.5 GHz
- Quad core
6.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD A6 3620
| | Significantly more l2 cache 4 MB | | More cores 4 |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | | Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 70.5 °C |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3220 vs 3620
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Unlocked | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nms | vs | 32 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,764 | vs | 795 | Around 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| More l3 cache | 3 MB | vs | 1 MB | 3x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 6x more l3 cache per core | |||
| Better PassMark score | 4,229 | vs | 2,895 | More than 45% better PassMark score | |||
| Better performance per watt | 10.62 pt/W | vs | 6.7 pt/W | Around 60% better performance per watt | |||
| Slightly lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 52.81W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Better geekbench (32-bit) score | 5,389 | vs | 4,049 | Around 35% better geekbench (32-bit) score | |||
| Marginally newer | Sep, 2012 | vs | Jan, 2012 | Release date 7 months later | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Higher Maximum Operating Temperature | 70.5 °C | vs | 65.3 °C | Around 10% higher Maximum Operating Temperature | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs A6 3620
GeekBench (32-bit)
GeekBench
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3220 | vs | A6 3620 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 55W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 10.62 pt/W | 6.7 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 52.81W | |
details | Core i3 3220 | vs | A6 3620 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 32 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 65.3°C | Unknown - 70.5°C | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | Radeon™ HD 6530D | |
 Intel Core i3 3220  Report a correction |  AMD A6 3620 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| 2500 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $64 | $125 | |
| G2020 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $120 | $125 | |
| 6300 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | ||
| 5200 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $125 | |
| 4130 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $70 | $125 | |
| G3220 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | ||
| Q6600 vs 3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $340 | ||
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $340 | $240 | |
| 4770K vs 4670K | ||
 | VS | |
| $332 | $340 | |
| 4820k vs 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $393 | $281 | |
| 4500U vs 4200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $240 | $200 | |
| 4670K vs 8350 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | $225 | |
| 4200U vs 3230M | ||
 | VS |  |
| $378 | $378 | |
| 4700MQ vs 4700HQ | ||
