Winner
Intel Core i3 3220
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3220 based on its performance, single-core performance and overclocking.
See full details Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD A6 3620 |
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
7.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3220
 | Significantly higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
| | Much better PassMark score 4,229 | | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,764 |
by Don-Woligroski (Oct, 2012)The Core i3-3220 doesn't benefit from Intel's Turbo Boost technology at all, but instead relies on an architecture able to execute more instructions per cycle than AMD.
VS
Released December, 2011
AMD A6 3620
- 2.5 GHz
- Quad core
7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD A6 3620
| | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
| | More cores 4 | | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 70.5 °C |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3220 vs 3620 among desktop CPUs (45 to 75W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 7.3 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i3 3220CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better PassMark score | 4,229 | vs | 2,857 | Around 50% better PassMark score | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,764 | vs | 795 | Around 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Higher GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | vs | 443 MHz | More than 45% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 52.81W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer | Sep, 2012 | vs | Dec, 2011 | Release date 8 months later | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.48 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 70.5 °C | vs | 65.3 °C | Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3220 vs A6 3620
Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3220 | vs | A6 3620 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 55W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.38 pt/W | 2.45 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 52.81W | |
details | Core i3 3220 | vs | A6 3620 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 65.3°C | Unknown - 70.5°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.43 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.48 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | Radeon™ HD 6530D | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 443 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1866 | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
 Intel Core i3 3220  Report a correction |  AMD A6 3620 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $117 | $238 | |
| Q6600 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $118 | $238 | |
| J1900 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $85 | $238 | |
| 5800K vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $35 | $238 | |
| 6300 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $196 | $238 | |
| E8400 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $94 | $238 | |
| J2900 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $158 | $238 | |
| G2020 vs 3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $393 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $393 | $227 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7410 vs 5200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $741 | $661 | |
| 6500U vs 6200U | ||
| | VS | |
| $661 | $281 | |
| 6200U vs 5200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $161 | $281 | |
| N3700 vs 5200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
