Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Celeron N2807

Intel Celeron N2807

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3217UE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3217UE

Report a correction
Significantly better turbo clock speed 900 MHz vs 750 MHz 20% better turbo clock speed
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better PassMark (Single core) score 703 vs 441 Around 60% better PassMark (Single core) score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better PassMark score 2,162 vs 852 More than 2.5x better PassMark score
Slightly higher GPU clock speed 350 MHz vs 313 MHz More than 10% higher GPU clock speed
Front view of Intel Celeron N2807

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2807

Report a correction
Much better performance per watt 11.49 pt/W vs 4.92 pt/W More than 2.2x better performance per watt
Lower typical power consumption 3.49W vs 13.81W 4x lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.17 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per dollar 0.46 pt/$ vs 0.34 pt/$ More than 35% better performance per dollar
Newer Feb, 2014 vs Jul, 2012 Release date over 1 years later
Lower annual home energy cost 1.04 $/year vs 4.1 $/year 4x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 3.77 $/year vs 14.89 $/year 4x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3217UE vs Celeron N2807

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3217UE  vs
Celeron N2807 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.58 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 1023
BGA 1170
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 4.3W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 1.04 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 3.77 $/year
Performance per watt 4.92 pt/W 11.49 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 3.49W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i3 3217UE  vs
Celeron N2807 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 105°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.17 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz 2.17 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 313 MHz
Turbo clock speed 900 MHz 750 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 4,096 MB
Intel Core i3 3217UE
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N2807
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus