Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Celeron 3765U

Intel Celeron 3765U

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3217UE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3217UE

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
Better turbo clock speed 900 MHz vs 850 MHz More than 5% better turbo clock speed
Higher GPU clock speed 350 MHz vs 300 MHz More than 15% higher GPU clock speed
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Celeron 3765U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 3765U

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per dollar 0.96 pt/$ vs 0.34 pt/$ More than 2.8x better performance per dollar
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,092 vs 703 More than 55% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better performance per watt 6.87 pt/W vs 4.92 pt/W Around 40% better performance per watt
Newer Apr, 2015 vs Jul, 2012 Release date over 2 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3217UE vs Celeron 3765U

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3217UE  vs
Celeron 3765U 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.9 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 15W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 4.92 pt/W 6.87 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 12.19W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i3 3217UE  vs
Celeron 3765U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz 1.9 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 300 MHz
Turbo clock speed 900 MHz 850 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 16,384 MB
Intel Core i3 3217UE
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 3765U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus