0 Comments
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron U3400 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core i3 3217U vs the Celeron U3400. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron U3400 vs the Core i3 3217U. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3217U vs Celeron U3400
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 3217U
2,887
Celeron U3400
1,116
GeekBench
Core i3 3217U
4,546
Celeron U3400
1,623
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Core i3 3217U
29.1
Celeron U3400
988
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i3 3217U
2,299
Celeron U3400
727
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i3 3217U
879
Celeron U3400
422
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3217U | vs | Celeron U3400 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.06 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
BGA 1023 | |||
BGA 1288 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 17W | 18W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 6.98 pt/W | 2.14 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 14.63W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI 2.0 | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 2,500 MT/s |
details | Core i3 3217U | vs | Celeron U3400 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 18 | 8 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.07 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 1.07 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.8 GHz | 1.07 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 166 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | 500 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3L-1333 | |||
DDR3RS-1600 | |||
DDR3RS-1333 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s |
Intel Core i3 3217U ![]() | Intel Celeron U3400 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
3217U vs 6010 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
3217U vs N2830 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $75 | |
3217U vs 1007U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $80 | |
3217U vs 3110M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
3217U vs 450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
3217U vs 6110 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||