Winner
Intel Core i3 3217U
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3217U based on its .
See full details Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 1007U |
VS
Many times newer processors are not necessarily better, when compared with older ones. This is the case with the Intel Core i3 3217U and the Intel Celeron 1007U. Despite the Celeron being newer than the i3, the latter beats the Celeron in almost every aspect and I will go into detail about how it does it.
First of all, the two cores of the i3 are clocked at 1.8GHz whereas the Celeron cores are clocked at just 1.5GHz, but this isn’t the only difference. Furthermore the i3 is hyperthreaded, which means it can handle twice the amount of simultaneous threads than the Celeron, but the i3 also has 3MB of L3 cache, which is 1MB more than the Celeron itself.
This simple comparison and show of raw numbers clearly shows that the i3 is better, even if older. The statistics in the sheet below also support this conclusion.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3217U vs 1007U among laptop CPUs (over 15W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 7 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core i3 3217U vs the Celeron 1007U. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 1007U vs the Core i3 3217U. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 1007U
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3217U | vs | Celeron 1007U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1023 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 17W | 17W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 6.94 pt/W | 4.36 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI 2.0 | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Core i3 3217U | vs | Celeron 1007U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 18 | 15 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| DDR3RS-1600 | |||
| DDR3RS-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
 Intel Core i3 3217U  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron 1007U Report a correction |
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 32 laptops with the Intel Core i3 3217U, starting from $319
- 3 laptops with the Intel Celeron 1007U, starting from $260
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| AMD E1 6010 vs Intel Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $141 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron N2830 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| AMD E 450 vs Intel Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| AMD A4 5000 vs Intel Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| AMD E2 6110 vs Intel Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $80 | $225 | |
| Intel Core i3 3110M vs 3217U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $296 | ||
| AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $168 | $300 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A10 7th Gen A10-9600P vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 7410 vs Intel Core i5 5200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,506 | $281 | |
| Intel 7200U vs Core i5 6200U | ||
| | VS | |
| $296 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
