| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Atom Z2760 |
Intel Core i3 3217U
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3217U
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Laptops are an important gadget for the modern worker. He can work while on the go, thanks to today’s laptops which are not only thin and light, but pack great battery life too. For this matchup, we’re comparing two portable laptop CPUs: the Intel Core i3 3217U versus the Intel Atom Z2760.
The 3217U is part of the Core i3 U series, geared towards decent performance in Ultraportable laptops. Aside from basic tasks, it can also play HD movies, run multi-threaded programs, or even play the occasional game. This model packs a 1.8GHz Dual Core, with 4 threads and 3MB cache. It consumes 17W TDP of power, which is quite respectable for an Ultraportable processor.
In contrast is the Z2760 which is part of the Atom series. The Atom was designed for Netbooks, which run cheap, cool, and small. As such, it’s only good for basic tasks such as web surfing, word processing, or watching SD videos. The Z2760 is a 1.8 GHz Dual Core with 4 threads and only 1MB cache. Despite its slightly slower specs, it’s exceptional when it comes to power consumption, as it only uses 2W TDP.
Benchmarks show that the 3217U is indeed the faster chip: it led by 134% in the 3Dmark06 CPU test, 228% in GeekBench, and an outstanding 234% in the PassMark. But keep in mind that these are only performance tests; as for Battery life, the Atom can get up to 5-7 hours more than the competition.
In conclusion, choose the CPU which best suits your needs. For an Ultraportable laptop which is fast and fully featured, we recommend the Intel Core i3 3217U. For a small laptop which gets great battery life but can only run basic tasks, then you can’t go wrong with the Intel Atom Z2760.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom Z2760 vs the Core i3 3217U. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3217U vs Atom Z2760
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3217U | vs | Atom Z2760 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 17W | 2W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 0.48 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 6.98 pt/W | 16.38 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 1.63W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI 2.0 | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Core i3 3217U | vs | Atom Z2760 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | Integrated | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 533 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3L-1333 | |||
DDR3RS-1600 | |||
DDR3RS-1333 | |||
DDR2-800 | |||
DDR2 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s |
Intel Core i3 3217U ![]() | Intel Atom Z2760 ![]() |
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 32 laptops with the Intel Core i3 3217U, starting from $319
- 3 laptops with the Intel Atom Z2760, starting from $525
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
3217U vs 6010 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
3217U vs N2830 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $75 | |
3217U vs 1007U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $80 | |
3217U vs 3110M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
3217U vs 450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
3217U vs 6110 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||