Intel Core i3 3217U vs AMD R R-252F |
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i3 3217U
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3217U
 | Much better turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
| | More threads 4 | | Higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C |
VS
Released May, 2012
AMD R R-252F
- 1.9 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD R R-252F
| | More l2 cache 1 MB | | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | vs | 417 MHz | More than 2.5x better turbo clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 105 °C | vs | 100 °C | 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| |||||||
| More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Core i3 3217U vs R R-252F
clock speed
L2 cache
gpu clock speed
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3217U | vs | R R-252F |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| XOP | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| TBM | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 17W | 17W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 14.89 $/year | 14.89 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 13.81W | |
details | Core i3 3217U | vs | R R-252F |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 18 | 9 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.8 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | AMD Radeon HD 7400G | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 333 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | 417 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| DDR3RS-1600 | |||
| DDR3RS-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
 Intel Core i3 3217U  Report a correction |  AMD R R-252F Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| 3217U vs 6010 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| 3217U vs N2830 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $75 | |
| 3217U vs 1007U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $80 | |
| 3217U vs 3110M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| 3217U vs 6110 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| 3217U vs 450 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
