Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3217U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3217U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 0.4 GHz Around 4.5x higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Sep, 2000 Release date over 11 years later
More l2 cache 0.5 MB vs 0.25 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Front view of AMD K6-IIIE+ 400

Reasons to consider the
AMD K6-IIIE+ 400

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD K6-IIIE+ 400 vs the Intel Core i3 3217U.

Features Key features of the Core i3 3217U  vs K6-IIIE+ 400 

clock speed

Core i3 3217U
1.8 GHz
K6-IIIE+ 400
0.4 GHz

L2 cache

Core i3 3217U
0.5 MB
K6-IIIE+ 400
0.25 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3217U  vs
K6-IIIE+ 400 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 0.4 GHz
Socket type
BGA 1023
Super 7

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Core i3 3217U  vs
K6-IIIE+ 400 
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.25 MB
Manufacture process 22 nm 180 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption 13.81W N/A
Intel Core i3 3217U
Report a correction
AMD K6-IIIE+ 400
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus