Intel Core i3 3217U vs AMD E1 6010

	Performance
	Benchmark performance using all cores
Core i3 3217U 4.8 E1 6010 4.9 Celeron N2830 5.0
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

	Single-core Performance
	Individual core benchmark performance
Core i3 3217U 5.8 E1 6010 5.2 Celeron N2830 5.1
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

	Integrated Graphics
	Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Core i3 3217U 2.7 E1 6010 n.d. Celeron N2830 n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

	Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)
	Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Core i3 3217U 6.6 E1 6010 n.d. Celeron N2830 4.8
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

	Performance per Watt
	How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Core i3 3217U 5.5 E1 6010 6.2 Celeron N2830 6.8
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

	Value
	Are you paying a premium for performance?
Core i3 3217U 6.1 E1 6010 8.7 Celeron N2830 n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.4	CPUBoss Score
	Combination of all six facets
Core i3 3217U 3.8 E1 6010 5.4 Celeron N2830 4.1

Winner
AMD E1 6010

CPUBoss recommends the AMD E1 6010 based on its features.

See full details

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

Intel Core i3 3217U

Front view of Intel Core i3 3217U

Front view of AMD E1 6010

AMD E1 6010

Join the discussion

Front view of Intel Core i3 3217U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3217U

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Core i3 3217U vs the AMD E1 6010.

Front view of AMD E1 6010

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 6010

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD E1 6010 vs the Intel Core i3 3217U.

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

3,037

1,248

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

1,441

720

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

93,600 MB/s

664,400 MB/s

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

29.1

15.7

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

2,299

841

PassMark (Single Core)

879

483

summary	Core i3 3217U	vs	E1 6010
Clock speed	1.8 GHz		1.35 GHz
Cores	Dual core		Dual core
Socket type
BGA 1023
BGA 769
Is unlocked	No		No
features
Has a NX bit	Yes		Yes
Supports trusted computing	No		No
Has virtualization support	Yes		Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes		Yes
power consumption
TDP	17W		10W
Annual home energy cost	4.1 $/year		2.41 $/year
Performance per watt	6.99 pt/W		25.99 pt/W
Typical power consumption	13.81W		8.13W

details	Core i3 3217U	vs	E1 6010
Architecture	x86-64		x86-64
Threads	4		2
L2 cache	0.5 MB		1 MB
L2 cache per core	0.25 MB/core		0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process	22 nm		28 nm
Max CPUs	1		1
Operating temperature	Unknown - 105°C		Unknown - 90°C
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed	1.8 GHz		1.35 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	1.8 GHz		1.35 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	1.8 GHz		1.35 GHz
integrated graphics
GPU	GPU		GPU
Label	Intel® HD Graphics 4000		Radeon R2 series
GPU clock speed	350 MHz		350 MHz
memory controller
Memory controller	Built-in		Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1333
DDR3RS-1600
DDR3RS-1333

Intel Core i3 3217U

Report a correction

AMD E1 6010

Report a correction

VS

Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U

VS

Intel Celeron N2840 vs AMD E1 6010

Comments

comments powered by Disqus