Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3217U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3217U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 0.8 GHz 2.2x higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Athlon 800

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 800

Report a correction
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Core i3 3217U  vs Athlon 800 

clock speed

Core i3 3217U
1.8 GHz
Athlon 800
0.8 GHz

L2 cache

Core i3 3217U
0.5 MB
Athlon 800
0.5 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3217U  vs
Athlon 800 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 0.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
BGA 1023
Slot A

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Core i3 3217U  vs
Athlon 800 
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 13.81W N/A
Intel Core i3 3217U
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 800
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus