Intel Core i3 3120M vs Celeron 900 |
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3120M
- 2.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3120M
 | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
| | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 900 vs the Core i3 3120M. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3120M vs Celeron 900
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3120M | vs | Celeron 900 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| rPGA 988B | |||
| 478 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.96 pt/W | 2.16 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W | |
details | Core i3 3120M | vs | Celeron 900 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 90°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 3.11 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.53 GHz | 3.11 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Core i3 3120M  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron 900 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3120M vs 2020M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $225 | |
| 3120M vs 3230M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $130 | |
| 3120M vs 3210M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $80 | |
| 3120M vs 3110M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $225 | |
| 3120M vs 3217U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| 3120M vs 5545M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $119 | |
| 3120M vs 4000M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS | |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
