Winner
Intel Core i3 3110M
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3110M based on its performance.
See full details Intel Core i3 3110M vs 2370M |
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i3 3110M
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
6.7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3110M
 | Newer manufacturing process 22 nms | | More number of displays supported 3 |
| | Supports more RAM 32,768 MB | | Significantly better performance per dollar 4.99 pt/$ |
by Ian-Cutress (Sep, 2014)The first batch of 4.5W Core M processors aim at either the 11.6-inch, 8mm thick fanless tablet design as indicated in the graph above, or similarly a 10.1-inch 10mm thick tablet will also be suitable.
VS
Released January, 2012
Intel Core i3 2370M
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
6.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the 2370M
| | More l2 cache 1 MB | | Better turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz |
| | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
by hassan-mujtaba (Sep, 2014)So some of the key aspects of the Broadwell microarchitecture would be to be suitable for fanless devices, deliver on core performance improvements and feature enhanced graphics, media, display capabilities.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3110M vs 2370M
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| 3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Power Consumption | |
How much power does the processor require? | |
| TDP | |
Features | |
How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product? | |
| Features and specifications that differ between products | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i3 3110MCPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nms | vs | 32 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
| Supports more RAM | 32,768 MB | vs | 16,384 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
| Significantly better performance per dollar | 4.99 pt/$ | vs | 1.78 pt/$ | More than 2.8x better performance per dollar | |||
| Higher Maximum Operating Temperature | 105 °C | vs | 100 °C | 5% higher Maximum Operating Temperature | |||
| Newer | Jun, 2012 | vs | Jan, 2012 | Release date 5 months later | |||
| |||||||
| More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Better turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | 15% better turbo clock speed | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3110M vs 2370M
GeekBench (32-bit)
GeekBench (64-bit)
3D Mark 11 (Physics)
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3110M | vs | 2370M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| rPGA 988B | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | HD Graphics 3000 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,150 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 16,384 MB | |
details | Core i3 3110M | vs | 2370M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 32 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 24 | 24 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.44 GHz | 2.44 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,197.2 | 1,174.9 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.44 GHz | 2.44 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 12.11 pt/W | 11.43 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI 2.0 | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
 Intel Core i3 3110M  Report a correction |  Intel Core i3 2370M Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $85 | |
| N3530 vs 3110M | ||
 | VS | |
| $85 | ||
| 6210 vs 3110M | ||
 | VS | |
| $24 | $85 | |
| 4500M vs 3110M | ||
 | VS | |
| $275 | $85 | |
| 4005U vs 3110M | ||
 | VS | |
| $161 | $85 | |
| N3520 vs 3110M | ||
 | VS | |
| $326 | $85 | |
| 3217U vs 3110M | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | $85 | |
| 4030U vs 3110M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $330 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $361 | $327 | |
| 5820K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS | |
| $229 | $327 | |
| 4690K vs 4790K | ||
| | VS | |
| $161 | $85 | |
| N3530 vs 3110M | ||
| | VS | |
| $327 | $330 | |
| 4790K vs 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $393 | $281 | |
| 4510U vs 4210U | ||
