Winner
Intel Core i3 3110M
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3110M based on its .
See full details Intel Core i3 3110M vs 2370M |
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i3 3110M
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
6.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3110M
 | Newer manufacturing process 22 nms | | More number of displays supported 3 |
| | Supports more RAM 32,768 MB | | Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 105 °C |
VS
Released January, 2012
Intel Core i3 2370M
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
6.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the 2370M
| | Better turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz | | Better geekbench (64-bit) score 5,949 |
by Joel-Hruska (Jun, 2014)Dubbed the Core M, this chip could be a fundamental game changer for Santa Clara, for one simple reason — it will allow the company to finally build big-core x86 devices that fit into form factors thin enough to compete with current Android, Apple, and Windows tablets based on its own Bay Trail.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3110M vs 2370M
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| 3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Power Consumption | |
How much power does the processor require? | |
| TDP | |
Features | |
How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product? | |
| Features and specifications that differ between products | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i3 3110MCPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nms | vs | 32 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
| Supports more RAM | 32,768 MB | vs | 16,384 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
| Higher Maximum Operating Temperature | 105 °C | vs | 100 °C | 5% higher Maximum Operating Temperature | |||
| Marginally newer | Jun, 2012 | vs | Jan, 2012 | Release date 5 months later | |||
| |||||||
| Better turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | 15% better turbo clock speed | |||
| Better geekbench (64-bit) score | 5,949 | vs | 4,282 | Around 40% better geekbench (64-bit) score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3110M vs 2370M
GeekBench (32-bit)
GeekBench (64-bit)
3D Mark 11 (Physics)
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3110M | vs | 2370M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| rPGA 988B | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | HD Graphics 3000 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,150 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 16,384 MB | |
details | Core i3 3110M | vs | 2370M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 32 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 24 | 24 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.46 GHz | 2.44 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.46 GHz | 2.44 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 12.61 pt/W | 11.92 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI 2.0 | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
 Intel Core i3 3110M  Report a correction |  Intel Core i3 2370M Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $30 | $225 | |
| 4500M vs 3110M | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $225 | |
| 3217U vs 3110M | ||
 | VS | |
| $161 | $225 | |
| N3530 vs 3110M | ||
 | VS | |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 2020M vs 3110M | ||
 | VS | |
| $161 | $225 | |
| N3520 vs 3110M | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | ||
| 6210 vs 3110M | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | $225 | |
| 4200U vs 3110M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $329 | $313 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $340 | $313 | |
| 4790K vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $195 | $313 | |
| 4790 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $235 | $180 | |
| 4670K vs 8350 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $378 | ||
| 4700MQ vs 5750M | ||
 | VS | |
| $393 | $281 | |
| 4500U vs 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $281 | |
| 4200M vs 4200U | ||
