CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3110M vs T3500 among laptop CPUs (over 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

1.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i3 3110M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3110M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3110M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3110M

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Front view of Intel Celeron T3500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron T3500

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron T3500 vs the Core i3 3110M.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3110M vs Celeron T3500

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 3110M
125,500 MB/s
Celeron T3500
88,800 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3110M  vs
Celeron T3500 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
478
P

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 3.71 pt/W 2.47 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W

details

Core i3 3110M  vs
Celeron T3500 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.43 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 2.1 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,197.2 307.1
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.43 GHz 2.13 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 N/A
Latest DirectX 11.0 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Core i3 3110M
Report a correction
Intel Celeron T3500
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus