Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3110M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3110M

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 68.25W 2.4x lower typical power consumption
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
More l2 cache 0.5 MB vs 0.25 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 67.7 °C More than 55% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Oct, 2004 Release date over 7 years later
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 20.24 $/year 2.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 2.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron D 345J

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 345J

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 3.06 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.69 GHz vs 2.43 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.07 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Core i3 3110M  vs Celeron D 345J 

clock speed

Core i3 3110M
2.4 GHz
Celeron D 345J
3.06 GHz

L2 cache

Core i3 3110M
0.5 MB
Celeron D 345J
0.25 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Core i3 3110M
2.43 GHz
Celeron D 345J
3.69 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Core i3 3110M
2.4 GHz
Celeron D 345J
3.07 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3110M  vs
Celeron D 345J 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 3.06 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
LGA 775
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 35W 84W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 20.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 73.58 $/year
Typical power consumption 28.44W 68.25W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i3 3110M  vs
Celeron D 345J 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 24 23
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 67.7°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.43 GHz 3.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 3.07 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,197.2 297.3
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.43 GHz 3.69 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 N/A
Latest DirectX 11.0 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Core i3 3110M
Report a correction
Intel Celeron D 345J
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus