0 Comments
| Intel Core i3 3110M vs AMD Athlon 64 3100+ |
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i3 3110M
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 3110M
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz |
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C | ![]() | Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,214 |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Athlon 64 3100+
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon 64 3100+
![]() | More l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 20.31W | ![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i3 3110MCPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 105 °C | vs | 70 °C | 50% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,214 | vs | 663 | Around 85% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better PassMark score | 3,042 | vs | 433 | More than 7x better PassMark score | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more threads | |||
Better performance per watt | 3.71 pt/W | vs | 1.84 pt/W | More than 2x better performance per watt | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 20.31W | vs | 28.44W | Around 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | vs | 30.66 $/year | Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | vs | 8.43 $/year | Around 30% lower annual home energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3110M vs Athlon 64 3100+
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i3 3110M
3,042
Athlon 64 3100+
433
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i3 3110M
1,214
Athlon 64 3100+
663
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 3110M | vs | Athlon 64 3100+ |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
rPGA 988B | |||
754 | |||
462 | |||
AM2 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Core i3 3110M | vs | Athlon 64 3100+ |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 130 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.43 GHz | 2.47 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.43 GHz | 2.47 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 25W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 21.9 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.71 pt/W | 1.84 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 20.31W |
Intel Core i3 3110M ![]() | AMD Athlon 64 3100+ ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | ||
AMD A8 4500M vs Intel Core i3 3110M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $80 | |
Intel Pentium N3530 vs Core i3 3110M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | ||
AMD A4 6210 vs Intel Core i3 3110M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $80 | |
Intel Pentium 2020M vs Core i3 3110M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $80 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs 3110M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | ||
AMD A6 4400M vs Intel Core i3 3110M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $80 | |
Intel Pentium N3520 vs Core i3 3110M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||