CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3110M vs 4500M

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 3110M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3110M

Report a correction
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 32 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,214 vs 848 Around 45% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better 3DMark11 physics score 3,000 vs 2,080 Around 45% better 3DMark11 physics score
Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 105 °C vs 100 °C 5% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Slightly better 3DMark06 CPU score 2,988 vs 2,438 Around 25% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Slightly better geekbench (64-bit) score 5,374 vs 4,418 More than 20% better geekbench (64-bit) score
Slightly better performance per watt 12.85 pt/W vs 10 pt/W Around 30% better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD A8 4500M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A8 4500M

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 3110M vs A8 4500M

GeekBench (32-bit)

A8 4500M
3,198

GeekBench (64-bit)

A8 4500M
4,418

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

A8 4500M
2,080
Core i3 3110M A8 4500M @ community.futuremark.com

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

A8 4500M
2,438

Passmark

A8 4500M
2,698
Core i3 3110M A8 4500M @ cpubenchmark.net

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 3110M  vs
A8 4500M 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.9 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Radeon™ HD 7640G
Latest DirectX 11.0 11.0

details

Core i3 3110M  vs
A8 4500M 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.32 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 2.32 GHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 12.85 pt/W 10 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W
Intel Core i3 3110M
Report a correction
AMD A8 4500M
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
Tengo 2 computadoras una con un procesador intel I3 y otra con el AMD A8 y puedo decir que en todo sentido el procesador amd es mejor especialmente por sus potentes prestaciones graficas y que tiene overlock automatico. ---No se que analisis llevaron acabo pero en lo unico que intel supera a AMD es en capacidad de calculo a menor consumo energetico.
comments powered by Disqus