Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 2367M

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i3 2367M

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 2367M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2367M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 25.9 vs 4.2 Around 6.2x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 1.4 GHz vs 1.2 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
More l3 cache 3 MB vs 0.5 MB 6x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 3x more l3 cache per core
Better PassMark (Single core) score 681 vs 318 Around 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Higher GPU clock speed 350 MHz vs 276 MHz More than 25% higher GPU clock speed
Better performance per watt 4.97 pt/W vs 2.69 pt/W More than 85% better performance per watt
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better PassMark score 1,701 vs 310 Around 5.5x better PassMark score
Newer Oct, 2011 vs Jan, 2011 Release date 9 months later
Front view of AMD C 30

Reasons to consider the
AMD C 30

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 7.31W vs 13.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 2.17 $/year vs 4.1 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 7.88 $/year vs 14.89 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 2367M vs AMD C 30

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 2367M  vs
AMD C 30 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3

details

Core i3 2367M  vs
AMD C 30 
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 14 6
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label HD Graphics 3000 Radeon™ HD 6250
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 276 MHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 9W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 2.17 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 7.88 $/year
Performance per watt 4.97 pt/W 2.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 7.31W
Intel Core i3 2367M
Report a correction
AMD C 30
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus