0 Comments
| Intel Core i3 2365M vs Celeron 887 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core i3 2365M vs the Celeron 887. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 887 vs the Core i3 2365M. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 2365M vs Celeron 887
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 2365M
2,255
Celeron 887
1,990.5
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 2365M
1,092
Celeron 887
1,154.5
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 2365M
68,800 MB/s
Celeron 887
74.3 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Core i3 2365M
2,128
Celeron 887
1,965
GeekBench
Core i3 2365M
2,584
Celeron 887
1,965
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Core i3 2365M
29.9
Celeron 887
29
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Core i3 2365M
1,669
Celeron 887
1,297
PassMark (Single Core)
Core i3 2365M
677
Celeron 887
720
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 2365M | vs | Celeron 887 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
BGA 1023 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 17W | 17W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 4.78 pt/W | 3.25 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Core i3 2365M | vs | Celeron 887 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 14 | 15 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 888.8 | 835.9 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 16,384 MB |
Intel Core i3 2365M ![]() | Intel Celeron 887 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
2365M vs E2-2000 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
2365M vs 987 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
2365M vs 997 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
2365M vs 2127U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $225 | |
2365M vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
2365M vs MV-40 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $75 | |
2365M vs 1007U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||