Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 2365M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2365M

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 77.19W 5.6x lower typical power consumption
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 71 °C More than 40% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly better performance per watt 4.78 pt/W vs 1.38 pt/W Around 3.5x better performance per watt
Newer Jul, 2012 vs Feb, 2009 Release date over 3 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 22.89 $/year 5.6x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 83.22 $/year 5.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Phenom II X4 910

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II X4 910

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 104,700 MB/s vs 68,800 MB/s More than 50% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 1.4 GHz More than 85% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.66 GHz vs 1.4 GHz More than 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More l3 cache 6 MB vs 3 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,814 vs 2,255 Around 2.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz vs 1.4 GHz More than 85% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 2365M vs Phenom II X4 910

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 2365M
68,800 MB/s
Phenom II X4 910
104,700 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 2365M  vs
Phenom II X4 910 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
BGA 1023
AM3
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 95W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 4.78 pt/W 1.38 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 77.19W

details

Core i3 2365M  vs
Phenom II X4 910 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 71°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.4 GHz 3.66 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.4 GHz 2.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.4 GHz 3.66 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A
Intel Core i3 2365M
Report a correction
AMD Phenom II X4 910
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus