CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2348M vs 5000

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), PassMark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Winner
Intel Core i3 2348M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 2348M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Core i3 2348M

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Core i3 2348M

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 2348M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2348M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.55 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,108 vs 719 Around 55% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 2,829 vs 2,038.5 Around 40% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Slightly better PassMark score 2,609 vs 1,891 Around 40% better PassMark score
Slightly better geekbench (64-bit) score 3,800 vs 2,720 Around 40% better geekbench (64-bit) score
Front view of AMD A4 5000

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 5000

Report a correction
More l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly lower typical power consumption 10.97W vs 28.44W 2.6x lower typical power consumption
Higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 85 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better performance per watt 20.42 pt/W vs 10.92 pt/W More than 85% better performance per watt
Newer Feb, 2014 vs Jan, 2013 Release date over 1 years later
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 3.25 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 2.6x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 2348M vs A4 5000

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A4 5000
2,499

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A4 5000
2,720

GeekBench

A4 5000
2,720

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

A4 5000
2,038.5

PassMark Data courtesy PassMark

A4 5000
1,891

PassMark (Single Core) Data courtesy PassMark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 2348M  vs
A4 5000 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 1.55 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
BGA 769
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 12,800 MB/s

details

Core i3 2348M  vs
A4 5000 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 85°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 3000 Radeon HD 8330

power consumption

TDP 35W 13.5W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 3.25 $/year
Performance per watt 10.92 pt/W 20.42 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 10.97W
Intel Core i3 2348M
Report a correction
AMD A4 5000
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus