CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2348M vs 5000 among laptop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i3 2348M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 2348M  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 2348M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2348M

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 3 MB vs None Compared to all cpus, 3 MB l3 cache is just OK
Significantly higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.55 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 2,829 vs 2,038.5 Around 40% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 3,576 vs 2,562 Around 40% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 3,411 vs 2,499 More than 35% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Better geekbench 2 (64-bit) score 3,800 vs 2,720 Around 40% better geekbench 2 (64-bit) score
Front view of AMD A4 5000

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 5000

Report a correction
More l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly lower typical power consumption 10.97W vs 28.44W 2.6x lower typical power consumption
Newer Feb, 2014 vs Jan, 2013 Release date over 1 years later
Better geekbench 3 AES single core score 752,800 MB/s vs 113,400 MB/s Around 6.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 85 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 3.25 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 2.6x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 2348M vs A4 5000

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A4 5000
2,562

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 2348M
113,400 MB/s
A4 5000
752,800 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A4 5000
2,499

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A4 5000
2,720

GeekBench

A4 5000
2,720

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

A4 5000
1,892

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 2348M  vs
A4 5000 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 1.55 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
BGA 769
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 12,800 MB/s

details

Core i3 2348M  vs
A4 5000 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB None
Manufacture process 32 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 85°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 3000 Radeon HD 8330

power consumption

TDP 35W 13.5W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 3.25 $/year
Performance per watt 4.42 pt/W 15.86 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 10.97W
Intel Core i3 2348M
Report a correction
AMD A4 5000
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus