Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Intel Celeron N3050

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 2340UE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2340UE

Report a correction
Better PassMark (Single core) score 689 vs 467 Around 50% better PassMark (Single core) score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Significantly better performance per watt 8.65 pt/W vs 4.34 pt/W Around 2x better performance per watt
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.14 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 13.81W 2.8x lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Jun, 2011 Release date over 3 years later
Better performance per dollar 0.48 pt/$ vs 0.32 pt/$ More than 50% better performance per dollar
Lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 4.1 $/year 2.8x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 14.89 $/year 2.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 2340UE vs Celeron N3050

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 2340UE  vs
Celeron N3050 
Clock speed 1.3 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 6W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 1.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 5.26 $/year
Performance per watt 4.34 pt/W 8.65 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 4.88W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Core i3 2340UE  vs
Celeron N3050 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.3 GHz 2.14 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.3 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.3 GHz 2.14 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 3000 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 320 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,998.4 MB 8,192 MB
Intel Core i3 2340UE
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus