Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 2330M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2330M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 70% higher clock speed
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
Significantly more l3 cache 3 MB vs 0.5 MB 6x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Newer manufacturing process 32 nms vs 40 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 6x more l3 cache per core
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly higher Maximum Operating Temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Slightly better performance per watt 11.08 pt/W vs 6.62 pt/W More than 65% better performance per watt
Front view of AMD E 300

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 300

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 28.44W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Marginally newer Aug, 2011 vs Jun, 2011 Release date 2 months later

Features Key features of the Core i3 2330M  vs E 300 

clock speed

Core i3 2330M
2.2 GHz
E 300
1.3 GHz

L2 cache

E 300
1 MB

L3 cache

E 300
0.5 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 2330M  vs
E 300 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4a
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 18W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 4.34 $/year
Performance per watt 11.08 pt/W 6.62 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 14.63W

details

Core i3 2330M  vs
E 300 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nms 40 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 3000 Radeon™ HD 6310
Intel Core i3 2330M
Report a correction
AMD E 300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus