CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2328M vs 1000M among laptop CPUs (over 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

0.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i3 2328M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 2328M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Core i3 2328M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2328M

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Core i3 2328M vs the Celeron 1000M.

Front view of Intel Celeron 1000M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1000M

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 1000M vs the Core i3 2328M.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 2328M vs Celeron 1000M

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Core i3 2328M
108,750 MB/s
Celeron 1000M
93,900 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Core i3 2328M  vs
Celeron 1000M 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
rPGA 988B

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 3.46 pt/W 2.11 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Core i3 2328M  vs
Celeron 1000M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 22 18
Operating temperature Unknown - 85°C Unknown - 105°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.26 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.26 GHz 1.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 3000 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Core i3 2328M
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 1000M
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
thnk god i3 wins but celeron 10000 run rivals y not i3 they both have hd graphics
comments powered by Disqus