Intel Core i3 2310M vs AMD G G-T56E |
Released February, 2011
Intel Core i3 2310M
- 2.1 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 2310M
 | Higher clock speed 2.1 GHz | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
| | Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,007 | | Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C |
VS
Released June, 2012
AMD G G-T56E
- 1.65 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD G G-T56E
| | Lower typical power consumption 14.63W | | Newer Jun, 2012 |
| | Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year | | Lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Core i3 2310MCPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 2.1 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 40 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,007 | vs | 441 | More than 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 90 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Better PassMark score | 2,424 | vs | 751 | Around 3.2x better PassMark score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.11 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Better performance per watt | 3.44 pt/W | vs | 2.23 pt/W | Around 55% better performance per watt | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.1 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Lower typical power consumption | 14.63W | vs | 28.44W | Around 50% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer | Jun, 2012 | vs | Feb, 2011 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year | vs | 8.43 $/year | Around 50% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 15.77 $/year | vs | 30.66 $/year | Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i3 2310M vs G G-T56E
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 2310M | vs | G G-T56E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Core i3 2310M | vs | G G-T56E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 40 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.11 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.1 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.11 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 18W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.44 pt/W | 2.23 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 14.63W | |
 Intel Core i3 2310M  Report a correction |  AMD G G-T56E Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $40 | $134 | |
| 2310M vs 2117U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $40 | $134 | |
| 2310M vs B950 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $40 | $134 | |
| 2310M vs B940 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $40 | $250 | |
| 2310M vs 2520M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $40 | $86 | |
| 2310M vs B830 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $40 | $225 | |
| 2310M vs 2410M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $40 | $98 | |
| 2310M vs 2540M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
