0 Comments
| Intel Core i3 2120 vs AMD Athlon Neo 40 |
Released January, 2011
Intel Core i3 2120
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i3 2120
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | More threads 4 |
VS
Released January, 2009
AMD Athlon Neo 40
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon Neo 40
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W | ![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C |
![]() | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 2x higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more threads | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Newer | Jan, 2011 | vs | Jan, 2009 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 12.19W | vs | 52.81W | 4.3x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 95 °C | vs | 69.1 °C | More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | 4.3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | 4.3x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Core i3 2120 vs Athlon Neo 40
clock speed
Core i3 2120
3.3 GHz
Athlon Neo 40
1.6 GHz
L2 cache
Core i3 2120
0.5 MB
Athlon Neo 40
0.5 MB
TDP
Core i3 2120
65W
Athlon Neo 40
15W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Core i3 2120 | vs | Athlon Neo 40 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Core i3 2120 | vs | Athlon Neo 40 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 69.1°C | Unknown - 95°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2000 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 12.19W |
Intel Core i3 2120 ![]() | AMD Athlon Neo 40 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$135 | $125 | |
2120 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$135 | $205 | |
2120 vs 2400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$135 | $150 | |
2120 vs 2100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$135 | ||
2120 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$135 | $76 | |
2120 vs G2030 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$135 | $180 | |
2120 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$135 | $144 | |
2120 vs 650 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||